GTM
Consulting

We are Marketbridge.
Growth consulting and marketing for modern leaders.
Play Video
Play video

Ready to reinvent growth? Let's connect.

The power of aggregators in healthcare

In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital marketing, the healthcare industry has witnessed a surge in the demand for affiliate marketing, with aggregators playing a central role. Over the past decade, insurers, brokers, and senior care companies have increasingly turned to aggregators, paying a percentage of the product sold or a flat rate for a lead or referral. The rise of digital marketing has propelled these aggregators, who leverage sophisticated online comparison platforms, digital marketing expertise, and superior online customer experiences. 

The insurance aggregator market in North America stands at an impressive $7 billion, according to data from Allied Market Research, showcasing the substantial influence of aggregators in the healthcare industry.

Lead Generation Aggregators vs. Product Comparison Aggregators

Understanding the nuances between lead generation and product comparison aggregators is essential for companies navigating the affiliate marketing landscape. 

Lead Generation Aggregators

Lead generation aggregators employ their own no-brand-name marketing strategies to create demand, capture consumer interest, and subsequently sell leads to end-users such as insurers, brokers, or senior care companies. This can take various forms, including customer lists, leads, and introductions. 

Exclusivity: In addition to determining the depth of lead generation, executives must weigh the importance of exclusivity in their partnerships with aggregators. Many aggregators sell the same leads to multiple partners unless the end user pays a premium for exclusive leads or referrals.

Higher and lower cost and exclusivity in partnerships with aggregators

Figure 1: Higher and lower cost and exclusivity in partnerships with aggregators

Product Comparison Aggregators

Product comparison aggregators sell directly to consumers by collecting branded digital marketing from competing companies on a proprietary online platform. This enables consumers to comparison shop in an unbiased manner. These aggregators often partner with trusted retail, pharmacy, and wellness brands to create co-branded marketing, offering consumers a convenient one-stop-shopping experience. 

Aligning Marketing Goals to the Right Affiliate Marketing Options

Leveraging affiliates for acquisition can be a lucrative endeavor if approached thoughtfully and executed with care. A clear understanding of the quality of member affiliate marketing can be crucial. Oftentimes, there are tradeoffs between lower acquisition costs and potentially lower customer lifetime value. 

Leveraging Aggregators for Acquisition

Acquiring members via affiliates is more than a “fire and forget” exercise. To maximize effectiveness, carriers can take concrete steps: 

  1. Capture Comparison Shoppers: Identify and capture consumers who are likely to comparison shop, ensuring a strong online presence on well-known comparison-shopping websites. 
  2. Increase Awareness for a Halo Effect: Elevate product and brand awareness to create a halo effect. Even when shopping around, consumers want to feel confident in their choices. 
  3. Broaden Reach: Aggregators, with their marketing efforts, have additional reach. Target audience segments that companies may not have otherwise captured, particularly in areas or demographics with lower penetration. 

Optimizing Member Retention

Retaining members acquired via aggregators presents unique challenges. To enhance retention, marketing executives should focus on four key factors: good data, early engagement, strong aggregator partnerships, and holistic analyses of aggregator-captured members. 

  • Good Data: Tracking member cohorts based on sales channels and applying predictive indices for likelihood to switch is essential for identifying high-risk members. 
  • Early Engagement: Members captured indirectly need early engagement strategies to foster a connection. Promote downloading the app, selecting a primary care provider, and completing the member profile. 
  • Strong Aggregator Partnerships: Collaborative communication plans between aggregators and insurers can improve retention among converted consumers, avoiding confusion and reinforcing the plan selection. 
  • Holistic Analyses: Regular analyses of aggregator-captured members are necessary to assess goal achievement and optimize aggregator utilization for future strategies. 

Navigating the Future of Healthcare Marketing

In conclusion, aggregators are an integral part of the health insurance landscape, offering companies the choice to actively capitalize on their strengths or passively receive sales. A scientific view of indirect channel tradeoffs, leveraging data to determine the future role of aggregators in a marketing and sales channel strategy, is key. To delve deeper into the intricacies of sales disruptions and recalibrated selling motions prompted by the pandemic, we invite you to download our whitepaper for invaluable insights. 

Download our whitepaper, “Navigating 5 Fundamental Shifts in Healthcare Marketing and Sales Channels”​

For a more in-depth exploration of the the role of aggregators, and four other disruptions, download our whitepaper.

4 situations when marketing effectiveness measurement is especially helpful

Every organization should have marketing effectiveness measurement tools at its disposal. Marketers can’t optimize on last-touch attribution alone, and educating internal stakeholders on how marketing channels work together has long-term benefits.

We’ve outlined four situations when marketing effectiveness tools, such as MMM and MTA, can be particularly helpful.

  1. Finance-led Organizations
  2. Diminishing Demand Environments
  3. Tightening Budget Environments
  4. Challenging Brand Environments

1. Finance-led Organizations

When the focus is on expense control, lean staffing models, and profitable revenue growth, marketing is frequently viewed as a cost center. CFOs often push marketers to employ media channels with the lowest cost per acquisition (typically demand capture channels such as paid search and affiliate), which may have a negative long-term impact. MMM and MTA can help finance-led organizations understand what portion of sales are driven by marketing without the risk of overattributing to paid search and affiliates.

Additionally, aligning on marketing-driven cost per acquisition can support (or start) conversations around the level of investment needed to generate additional sales to hit targets.

Average Daily Spend at Cost per Acquisition Hurdles

If finance sets a cost-per-acquisition limit at $100, Display could support an average of $34K daily spend, while CTV could only support an average of $3K.

Or, looking at it another way, if the budget increased by 15%, how many more sales would convert, and how would the overall cost per acquisition change?

increasing budget by 15%

Finance may be persuaded that the additional $3.6M in budget is worthwhile to generate an additional 13,000 sales.

2. Diminishing Demand Environments

When an organization has over-rotated toward lower funnel activities, sales demand decreases over time, and cost-pers increase. Marketing effectiveness measurement can help identify opportunities to increase upper funnel spend (to generate demand) through response curves. Response curves show where the next dollar should be allocated to maximize return and when a media will see less return on additional spend.

response curve

Once marketing decides to shift investment up the funnel, MMM and MTA can validate that this was the correct move, help track cost-pers by channel over time, and refresh spend curves at higher (or lower) levels to continue to optimize spend.

3. Tightening Budget Environments

No organization has an unlimited budget, and marketers often default to last-touch attribution to determine where to cut when budgets are reduced. Unfortunately, this is short-sighted; last touch significantly underweights less trackable activities, such as TV, online video, and other awareness marketing.

last touch underweights less trackable activities

Looking only at last touch in the above example, one would likely cut TV spend. However, the actual marketing ROI of TV is significantly better than what can be measured with last touch. Marketing effectiveness measurement helps make marketers smarter with more information about the performance of marketing channels.

4. Challenging Brand Environments

When organizations are struggling with brand—such as a PR incident, long-run customer service issues, a popular new category entrant, or lack of brand awareness activities—it can be challenging to stay the course on brand spend. Brand-building activities take a long time to pay off, and organizational stakeholders (finance or the board, for example) may want to see proof that investments are working.

MMM can measure the impact of marketing on brand health and, consequently, brand health’s impact on sales. While moving brand metrics significantly takes a long time, modeling can confirm and quantify the link between brand health and sales.

An equation on “responsiveness” and “stickiness” can quantify how much brand spend is required to move the brand metric. “Responsiveness” measures how the brand metric responds to marketing (i.e., how quickly marketing can move the metric). “Stickiness” measures how long the change marketing drove lasts (i.e., how quickly the metric returns to previous levels).

Combining these two elements quantifies how much spend is required to improve a particular brand metric and how long that change will last. Example: One week of $1M brand spend will yield a cumulative increase of 1.7 percentage points in Awareness over eight weeks.

brand metric and how long it lasts

Looking at historical sales performance during periods when brand metrics were higher helps quantify the sales impact of increasing a brand metric calculated in the formula above.

daily predicted outcome 2023

Together, these can help stakeholders outside of marketing understand the sales impact of these activities over a shorter period and buy marketing time for the flywheel of long-run brand improvement to take effect.

Conclusion

Usually, we are brought in when things aren’t going well, and frequently, the issue is one of the four situations covered above. All organizations could benefit from a more holistic approach to marketing measurement, though.

Download our framework, “Measuring the Impact of Brand Marketing on Business Growth”​

For a comprehensive exploration of brand marketing’s impact and our multi-stage modeling approach, download our detailed framework.​

The retention imperative: Securing long-term revenue growth in healthcare

As the health insurance landscape grows increasingly competitive, insurers must adapt to market changes to sustain revenue growth. For many individual products such as Medicare Advantage, individual health, and ancillary plans, switching rates are on the rise, reducing new plan members’ long-term value (LTV). It has become clear that relying solely on acquisition strategies is no longer viable; carriers must now focus on improving member retention rates.

Member Retention in Health Insurance

Acquisition vs. Retention Strategies

To illustrate that acquisition strategies alone are no longer viable, a simple pro forma scenario is useful. To set a baseline, let’s assume an insurance carrier has an individual product line of $400M in revenue, and let’s say that, based on recent years’ performance, membership is projected to decline by 4% over the next four years. This baseline projection now has two alternatives to achieve near-revenue neutrality: 1) spend more on acquisition to cover the retention shortfall (meaning 7% YoY acquisition growth), or 2) spend more on retention to end the rate decline (meaning improving average retention by 7 months). These three top-line scenarios are depicted in the graph below:

The Retention Imperative: Securing Long-Term Revenue Growth in Healthcare

Assuming a member acquisition cost of $1000, the company would need to spend $375M more on acquisition to shore up the gap. With decreasing productivity in acquisition marketing given the competitive environment, this is likely a best-case scenario. Now, let’s think about if those dollars were used to drive more quality member interactions and relationship equity. Focusing on the right areas of improvement are very likely to achieve the small amount of retention improvement required. Most health insurance carriers, given market circumstances right now, are likely better off considering strategic alternatives for improving retention than simply throwing more money at acquisition.

Embracing Member Success and Engagement Models

An intriguing parallel can be drawn between this challenge and the shift to subscription and XaaS (Everything as a Service) business models that occurred in many B2B industries, particularly within the tech sector. As these industries transitioned to subscription-based models over the past decade, the importance of customer retention and long-term revenue growth became more apparent.

To respond to this shift, the tech industry developed a new sales role: “Customer Success.” In smaller markets, marketing teams have taken on the responsibility of driving customer experience to ensure revenue growth. These new roles and responsibilities within commercial teams go beyond traditional servicing, placing a strong emphasis on customer engagement and relationship development.

To thrive in this increasingly competitive market, health insurance carriers should learn from their tech counterparts and fully embrace a member success model that goes beyond traditional customer service. The first step is to identify the key moments of truth where the member experience plays a crucial role in retention. At Marketbridge, these are referred to as Zero Moments of Truth (ZMOTs). For example, the first 90 days on a plan can be a critical period for establishing engagement and building product equity with new members.

To further enhance member retention, health insurers can consider the following strategies:

  • Personalized Communications: Tailor communications to individual member needs and preferences, offering valuable resources and support in managing their health and well-being.
  • Proactive Health Management: Reward members who take advantage of health assessments and ongoing preventive care, demonstrating the carrier’s commitment to their health.
  • Streamlined Claims Processing: Simplify the claims process with easy-to-use online tools and responsive member service to alleviate the stress associated with healthcare expenses.
  • Reward Loyalty: Implement loyalty programs that offer incentives for long-term members, such as additional benefits, or access to exclusive resources.
  • Enhance Digital Channels: Invest in user-friendly mobile apps and websites that provide easy access to plan information, claims status, and health resources, ensuring a seamless member experience.

While many health insurance carriers have Member Services teams and are beginning to invest heavily in tactics like the above, we still do not typically see cohesion and ownership across channels. Some carriers are looking for agents to take on more Member Services activities, however, a truly robust Member Services function can partner with agents to ease the member experience. Yet we typically see that the agent and sales apparatus significantly outpace the team staffing for Member Services. To truly move the needle, a new responsibility/function is likely necessary to be the owner of all member engagement and retention metrics. Whether this falls to a human-based servicing/member success function, a more marketing-focused revenue motion, or a hybrid, the critical point is someone and some team need to be on the hook for the holistic strategy and be empowered to execute against it.

Thriving in the Competitive Healthcare Market

To summarize, the competitive issues many health insurers are facing can be managed by learning from the strategies implemented by B2B sectors, particularly the tech industry, as they pivoted to subscription-based business models. By adopting member success and engagement models that focus on improving the member experience at key moments of truth, insurance carriers can positively impact retention rates and sustain revenue growth in an increasingly competitive market. By embracing innovation and putting members first, health insurers can ensure a prosperous future in this ever-evolving industry.

4 lead generation mistakes CMOs (and their teams) make

Assessing Lead Generation Mistakes for Long-Term Success

A CMO’s to-do list continues to expand. Generate leads and sales, navigate the ever-evolving digital landscape, maximize share of voice, optimize media, and continue to innovate to beat the competition, all while delivering a great experience online and offline by leveraging the latest technology (while also ensuring it integrates with existing MarTech).

In addition to that ever-expanding purview is increased competition everywhere. So it’s no surprise to see that CMO tenure remains at its lowest level in more than a decade, according to the Wall Street Journal. Success isn’t a given and CMOs face an uphill battle to justify budget and prove results.

Where do many CMOs turn when they need to demonstrate marketing’s effectiveness? Lead generation campaigns. Due to an inherent focus on measurability and ROI, lead-gen is a natural fit. However, that hyper-focus can lead to short-term gains at the expense of long-term results.

We’ve identified four common mistakes busy CMOs and their teams make that hinder lead gen performance. Is your team suffering from these problems?

  1. Can’t See the Forest for the Trees
  2. Over Segmentation
  3. Not Testing Enough
  4. Forgetting to Review Lead Generation Campaigns Holistically

Mistake #1: Can’t See the Forest for the Trees

Marketing teams can get so focused on tactics (A/B testing and tactic-level optimizations especially) that cross-media performance becomes an afterthought. Often marketing develops expertise by media channel and those individuals focus on that media alone—but who is reviewing how the media are working together? Are those individuals talking to each other regularly to identify cross-media trends (such as messaging that resonates with a particular audience)?

In extremely competitive industries, creative and messaging often become similar across all competitors. Rather than breaking through the clutter, each new creative test brings more sameness: same CTA, same value proposition, same visuals. When did you last audit your creative and messaging and compare value propositions and CTAs to your competitors?

Or maybe your organization is one that has historically focused on marketing activity. The number of content pieces developed, social media followers gained, or emails sent is not important if you aren’t able to tie that to marketing and business outcomes. Helping team members shift their mindset to be more strategic and focused on business outcomes can be a full-time job.

Mistake #2: Over Segmentation

How many segments are you targeting today? Is it the same across all media? Often audience segments sub-divide for a specific marketing tactic or campaign, and then these new sub-segments become the norm. Or sometimes segments are developed for a specific use case. However running an ever-expanding list of segments across marketing is inefficient, when really, most segments are based on the same factors.

In lead generation campaigns, creating messages specific to increasingly niche audience segments adds complexity across the buyer journey and narrows the funnel. You’ll be missing potential leads who don’t respond to the niche messaging while also driving smaller audience sub-segments that may not convert at the same rate as the larger established segments. The consumer experience can be personalized and adapted without over-segmenting and sacrificing the strategy.

Mistake #3: Not Testing Enough

Marketing needs to take risks to stay ahead of the competition and continue to drive strong results. Is your organization following the 70/20/10 rule?

Seventy percent of the budget focused on proven results, 20% focused on new promising areas, and 10% on brand new ideas.

Unfortunately, many Marketing teams focus too much on tactical tests: A/B testing minute changes on messaging, media, or segment. These optimizations are lower risk and easier to measure, but without some larger risks, how will your organization find areas of growth? Top teams test new audiences, new media, and completely new innovations, all while partnering closely with analytics to ensure tests are measurable and reproducible. What big bets has your organization made recently?

Mistake #4: Forgetting to Review Lead Generation Campaigns Holistically

The team is conducting daily media optimizations and testing regularly, but ROI is getting worse. Even if performance is flat, nearly one-third of marketers say generating more leads is a top priority (Hubspot). With pressure to improve performance, short-term gains are prioritized, which can lead to worse long-term performance.

Even if you’re doing everything right, an organization’s maniacal focus on measurability and ROI can lead to a bias for lead generation investment and other lower-funnel activities.

Top Marketing teams conduct holistic campaign assessments every few years to understand overall performance trends, identify where strategy may have unintentionally drifted and diagnose issues driving performance decline.

How to Fix Common Lead Generation Mistakes

If your organization is struggling with declining ROI or worse lead generation performance, you’re not alone. Often campaigns reach a point where optimizations have little impact and returns continue to decline.

That’s why we’ve created a 4-step approach to help Marketing teams evaluate lead generation campaigns for long-term success.

Download our framework, “Evaluating Lead Generation Campaigns for Long-Term Success”​

Download the framework, where we share four core steps to help marketing teams combat the natural decline of lead generation campaigns over time and strategy shift.

Skip to content