Ready to reinvent growth? Let's connect.

Declining Member Lifetime Value in Medicare Advantage market

Over the past several years, the growth seen by Medicare Advantage (MA) carriers and brokers has begun to stagnate. One of the forces driving this stagnation is the decline of Member Lifetime Value (MLV). MLV is a member’s inbound cash flow, minus outbound cash flow, over a member’s tenure with a single insurer; essentially, the expected net profit from a member for the time they are expected to remain with the carrier, discounted in future years by a carrier’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Over the past four years, three primary forces have concurrently exerted downward pressure on average Medicare Advantage MLVs:

  1. Declining member tenure
  2. Stagnant CMS payments
  3. Increasing claims costs

1. Declining member tenure

With a plateau in age-in Medicare Advantage penetration beginning in roughly 2022, an increasing number of new members are “switchers” from other carriers. Having already switched carriers at least once, these members may be more likely to switch again, regardless of actions taken by the carrier. With members remaining with a single carrier for a shorter period, the carrier has fewer years to extract value from that member.

2. Stagnant CMS payments

Over the past two years, carriers have seen lower reimbursements from CMS to pay for their members’ claims. In 2024, CMS payments under the Physician Fee Schedule adjusted for inflation began declining by 1.25%–in 2025, CMS payments will decline an additional 2.93%. However, with the policies in the CY 2026 Rate Announcement released by CMS last week projected to result in an increase of 5.06% in MA payments, this factor is expected to moderate for plan year 2026.

3. Increasing claims costs

Possibly the largest driver of declining MLVs, claims costs have been increasing for the past few years. During COVID, most members chose to delay screenings, tests, and non-emergency procedures (Journal of Clinical Oncology). From 2022 onward, the repercussions of these delays emerged, resulting in more serious—and costlier—diagnoses once members returned to the doctor (UC Davis Health). Members in the past few years have also been receiving the elective procedures that they delayed during the pandemic. It is likely that, over the next several years, these impacts of the pandemic will subside as members return to normal rates of screenings, tests, and non-emergency procedures.

Additionally, product decisions made during the 2020-2022 Plan Years to attract customers often resulted in coverage for expensive services not previously included, such as vision, hearing, and in-home support services. Finally, CMS temporarily expanded the definition of dually eligible members during the pandemic, but once these members began to be dropped in June 2023, carriers had fewer profitable DSNP members—and those that remained were less healthy and more expensive to service.

Toward higher Member Lifetime Value

Business leaders in the Medicare Advantage industry must adapt to the changes to Member Lifetime Value that have been observed over the past four years:

  • Better audience targeting can allow a carrier to isolate and target audiences by their estimated mean lifetime value and to only invest in acquisition marketing and sales up to the point where the marginal acquisition cost is estimated to be equal to the present value of future cash flows.
  • Adoption of vertical integration can result in tighter communication and better information from the carrier, leading to longer member tenure and higher lifetime values.
  • Digital and digitally assisted application technologies can improve speed, accuracy, and applicant satisfaction, reducing buyers’ remorse and the resulting switching behavior that decreases member tenure—with longer tenure, a higher MLV is possible.

For more information on how to succeed in the face of declining Member Lifetime Value, and other challenges in the MA industry, read our executive whitepaper: “The next decade of Medicare Advantage: 2025 and beyond.”

Download our whitepaper, “The next decade of Medicare Advantage: 2025 and beyond”​

Learn how the next decade will reward Medicare Advantage leaders who embrace agility, analytics, and a member-first approach.

How the demographic cliff shapes Medicare Advantage success

Current Medicare demographic trends are rooted in the Baby Boom. Post-war prosperity and GIs returning home in the 1950s and 60s led to inflated numbers of Medicare-eligible seniors entering the market from 2010 to 2025. Healthcare payers have been able to ride that demographic wave and observe year-over-year growth during this period with over four million new seniors becoming Medicare-eligible each year.

However, moving forward, we will likely never see so many people turning sixty-five. The number of incoming Medicare-eligible seniors has peaked and will begin to decline in the coming years. This will translate directly to fewer net-new Medicare Advantage enrollments each year.

Impact of the demographic cliff on customer acquisition

Smaller incoming applicant pools mean carriers will have to fight much harder for a limited supply of prospective Medicare Advantage members. These carriers will be competing in a highly saturated market as higher numbers of carriers have further increased competition. Increased competition also means more difficult marketing.

Marketing challenges:

  • The amount of mail, television ads, and other marketing that individuals receive has increased threefold over the past decade, decreasing the effectiveness of marketing.
  • Media costs continue to rise above the rate of inflation. In other words, carriers are spending more on less efficient marketing.

The road ahead for Medicare Advantage 

The road ahead looks difficult for the Medicare Advantage market. Applicant pools are shrinking, competition has increased, marketing is more expensive yet less efficient, and decreasing member tenure combined with stagnant CMS payments and increasing claims costs is driving down member lifetime value (MLV).

Those who will win in the Medicare Advantage market throughout the next decade will need to turn to go-to-market, product attractiveness, and clinical maturity as the leading drivers of growth. For more information on how to succeed in the face of these challenges, read our executive whitepaper The next decade of Medicare Advantage: 2025 and beyond.

Download our whitepaper, “The next decade of Medicare Advantage: 2025 and beyond”​

Learn how the next decade will reward Medicare Advantage leaders who embrace agility, analytics, and a member-first approach.

Article sources: American Community Survey, NCHS birth data, CMS.gov data, Marketbridge

5 forces stalling Medicare Advantage growth in the next decade

Five forces are converging to stall growth of the Medicare Advantage industry over the next decade—halting momentum enjoyed since the 1990s. While inflation and immutable demographic trends are recurring characters in this story, trends in trust and product quality reveal that carrier actions also contribute to the five stagnation forces:

  • Increased member acquisition costs
  • Fewer age-ins
  • Declining member lifetime values
  • Declining innovation on both product and member services
  • A rapidly changing go-to-market landscape

1 – Increased Member Acquisition Costs: Marketing and Sales

Since Covid, inflation has left its mark across the marketing funnel. Competition for cost per click is ensuring the Paid Search dollar doesn’t go as far, especially during the Annual Enrollment period peak. Postage rates make key Direct Mail campaigns costlier at 120% the rate of core inflation. Meanwhile in upper funnel, cost-per-thousand (CPM) was increasing by 5% per year shortly before 2024, leading to costlier brand marketing.

On the sales front, expenses are climbing too. On-target earnings (OTEs) for captive field agents have risen 5-10% per year since Covid. Agent turnover rate has also increased, lowering sales productivity, as newer agents need more training and “at bats” to sell more.

The takeaway: Costs are not going down, but better audience targeting over the next decade can make acquisition budgets drive a greater impact.

2 – Fewer age-ins

All Baby Boomers will have turned 65 by 2030, spelling an end to the era of rapid growth in newly eligibles. Between 2022 and 2027, an estimated 4.2-4.3 million individuals turn 65 per year. By 2040, the annual age-in population will be only 70% of that, around 3.1 million.

Medicare Advantage penetration of the eligible population also seems to be approaching a plateau around 55%. The sum effect is that annual net new enrollments in Medicare Advantage will trend downward in the decade to come. (American Community Survey, NCHS birth data, CMS.gov data)

The takeaway: In order to sustain growth, the industry will have to nurture product attractiveness and clinical maturity. In other words, insurers will have to work harder to grow.

3 – Declining Member Lifetime Values

Member Lifetime Value (MLV) is a member’s inbound cash flow minus outbound cash flow over a member’s tenure with a single insurer. All three parts of the equation are driving down MLV: members are disenrolling more frequently in the face of declining benefits, stagnant CMS payments and mounting claims costs. These claim costs can trace to Medicaid eligibility changes affecting Dual-eligible Special Needs Plan (DSNP) members, added dental and vision benefits, and forgone preventive care during Covid.

The takeaway: CMS payments are not keeping pace with the costs of servicing the neediest members, and a more productive partnership with CMS will be key to remedying this shift.

4 – Declining Innovation on Product and Member Services

Product innovation – adding fitness programs or dental benefits to health plan benefits for example – characterized recent years of Medicare Advantage. Inflation, once again, acts as a headwind here by discouraging maintenance of characteristic benefits and by reducing the value of food cards. But abandoned benefits stem from other sources too—in-home nurses’ visits, for example, received negative publicity with accusations of abundant fraud. Consequently, they became deemphasized.

Member service innovation might temper member disillusionment, but it occurs in a narrow domain. Government regulations require many communications, driving members to largely ignore most insurer messages. Another potential communication channel, insurer mobile apps, suffer low adoption rates due to competition with separate provider apps and limited data portability and functionality.

The takeaway: Innovation can happen under constraints, but a return to quality can light the path forward through greater efficiency across acquisition, member retention, and care delivery.

5 – Rapidly Changing Go-to-Market Landscape

Unit economics and member preferences comprise serious threats to the traditional channels for reaching the Medicare population. Linear TV is less captivating for seniors, direct mail is being hit with inflation, and effective paid search now requires commitment to bidding wars.

Insurers are rethinking their distribution channels, too. Third-party call centers and aggregators rose to importance around 2010, as Medicare Advantage welcomed age-ins at unprecedented volumes. However, aggregators have shown to generate customer confusion while attracting low lifetime value members, and third-party call centers may have eroded trust by their less than honest call tactics.

The takeaway: Winning over the next decade will look a few different ways. We present more data and additional considerations in our whitepaper, which you can download below.

Download our whitepaper, “The next decade of Medicare Advantage: 2025 and beyond”​

Learn how the next decade will reward Medicare Advantage leaders who embrace agility, analytics, and a member-first approach.

The state of healthcare digital CX

The state of healthcare digital CX

How consumer expectations are reshaping payer and provider go-to-market strategies

Digital expectations, rapid technological advancements, and changing regulations are reshaping how consumers buy health insurance and access healthcare. Today’s consumers demand seamless, personalized, and digitally integrated experiences, driving payers and providers to evolve or risk falling further behind.

We surveyed 1,000+ privately insured individuals (across ACA, Group, and Medicare Advantage plans) to uncover key CX trends across three areas:

  • Purchasing health insurance 
  • Accessing healthcare services
  • Engaging in health and wellness activities

Within each area, we highlight survey findings, strategic implications and provide actionable insights to help payers and providers refine their CX strategies and boost engagement in today’s increasingly digital and consumer-driven market.

Select insights from the report:

  • Digital enrollment must boost member confidence: Consumers who work with agents report about 23% higher enrollment satisfaction compared to those who enroll without an agent.
  • Pharmacy BOPIS usage is 22% across segments: Group members use ‘buy online purchase in-store’ the most at 26%.
  • Health insurers trail other insurers in using email to communicate with members: 58% of consumers with homeowners’ insurance said email was a top communication channel from their insurer vs. 49% for those with medical health insurance.

Unlock key insights for CX success

Download “The state of healthcare digital CX” report to explore how consumer expectations are reshaping payer and provider go-to-market strategies and discover how to navigate today’s rapidly evolving CX landscape.

Thank you for Downloading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus vel tincidunt turpis. Fusce tristique cursus malesuada. Pellentesque euismod nisi eget nunc sagittis ullamcorper. Duis vitae aliquet diam. Proin a blandit nisl. 

Subscribe to Marketbridge Updates

What’s next?

A new golden age for employee benefits

Employee benefits are at a turning point. Discover how GTM leaders can cut through complexity and unlock growth—read the whitepaper.
2025 marketing strategy benchmarks

2025 marketing strategy benchmarks

High-performing marketing teams build smarter strategies from the start. This report uncovers the mindset, strategies, and investments that drive marketing success, based on our annual survey of marketing leaders across industries.

The state of healthcare digital CX

The digital shift in healthcare: Are payers and providers keeping up? This report reveals CX trends from 1,000+ insured consumers—uncovering what’s working (and what’s not) across insurance shopping, care access, and wellness engagement.

The next decade of Medicare Advantage: 2025 and beyond

The next decade of Medicare Advantage: 2025 and beyond

Medicare Advantage leaders must pivot to win in an era of stagnation and fierce competition

After years of steady growth, Medicare Advantage faces new headwinds. Carriers are struggling with rising acquisition costs, reduced member lifetime values, and increased complexity in delivering member services and refining go-to-market strategies. This paper examines the market forces behind these changes and provides actionable strategies for leaders to thrive by balancing financial discipline with data-driven agility. 

This paper covers:

The five forces transforming Medicare Advantage: Rising costs, fewer age-ins, declining member lifetime values, stagnant innovation, and changing go-to-market dynamics.

  • Declining member lifetime value (MLV): Driven by shrinking member tenure, stagnant CMS payments, and rising costs—together threatening profitability.
  • Communication overload: Overwhelming member communications—from ANOCs to EOBs—lead to poor engagement and diminishing member trust.
  • Digital transformation opportunities: Simplified and digitally assisted application processes can reduce switching and improve member retention.
  • The aggregator impact: A media buying frenzy driven by aggregators has created confusion, high acquisition costs, and lower-quality members.
  • Data-driven decision-making: Advanced analytics and democratized data quality empower carriers to make smarter decisions, while profitability-based audience targeting ensures channels are aligned to acquire and retain higher-quality members.

Download the paper now to learn how the next decade will reward Medicare Advantage leaders who embrace agility, analytics, and a member-first approach.

Thank you for Downloading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus vel tincidunt turpis. Fusce tristique cursus malesuada. Pellentesque euismod nisi eget nunc sagittis ullamcorper. Duis vitae aliquet diam. Proin a blandit nisl. 

Subscribe to Marketbridge Updates

The power of aggregators in healthcare

In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital marketing, the healthcare industry has witnessed a surge in the demand for affiliate marketing, with aggregators playing a central role. Over the past decade, insurers, brokers, and senior care companies have increasingly turned to aggregators, paying a percentage of the product sold or a flat rate for a lead or referral. The rise of digital marketing has propelled these aggregators, who leverage sophisticated online comparison platforms, digital marketing expertise, and superior online customer experiences. 

The insurance aggregator market in North America stands at an impressive $7 billion, according to data from Allied Market Research, showcasing the substantial influence of aggregators in the healthcare industry.

Lead Generation Aggregators vs. Product Comparison Aggregators

Understanding the nuances between lead generation and product comparison aggregators is essential for companies navigating the affiliate marketing landscape. 

Lead Generation Aggregators

Lead generation aggregators employ their own no-brand-name marketing strategies to create demand, capture consumer interest, and subsequently sell leads to end-users such as insurers, brokers, or senior care companies. This can take various forms, including customer lists, leads, and introductions. 

Exclusivity: In addition to determining the depth of lead generation, executives must weigh the importance of exclusivity in their partnerships with aggregators. Many aggregators sell the same leads to multiple partners unless the end user pays a premium for exclusive leads or referrals.

Figure 1: Higher and lower cost and exclusivity in partnerships with aggregators

Product Comparison Aggregators

Product comparison aggregators sell directly to consumers by collecting branded digital marketing from competing companies on a proprietary online platform. This enables consumers to comparison shop in an unbiased manner. These aggregators often partner with trusted retail, pharmacy, and wellness brands to create co-branded marketing, offering consumers a convenient one-stop-shopping experience. 

Aligning Marketing Goals to the Right Affiliate Marketing Options

Leveraging affiliates for acquisition can be a lucrative endeavor if approached thoughtfully and executed with care. A clear understanding of the quality of member affiliate marketing can be crucial. Oftentimes, there are tradeoffs between lower acquisition costs and potentially lower customer lifetime value. 

Leveraging Aggregators for Acquisition

Acquiring members via affiliates is more than a “fire and forget” exercise. To maximize effectiveness, carriers can take concrete steps: 

  1. Capture Comparison Shoppers: Identify and capture consumers who are likely to comparison shop, ensuring a strong online presence on well-known comparison-shopping websites. 
  2. Increase Awareness for a Halo Effect: Elevate product and brand awareness to create a halo effect. Even when shopping around, consumers want to feel confident in their choices. 
  3. Broaden Reach: Aggregators, with their marketing efforts, have additional reach. Target audience segments that companies may not have otherwise captured, particularly in areas or demographics with lower penetration. 

Optimizing Member Retention

Retaining members acquired via aggregators presents unique challenges. To enhance retention, marketing executives should focus on four key factors: good data, early engagement, strong aggregator partnerships, and holistic analyses of aggregator-captured members. 

  • Good Data: Tracking member cohorts based on sales channels and applying predictive indices for likelihood to switch is essential for identifying high-risk members. 
  • Early Engagement: Members captured indirectly need early engagement strategies to foster a connection. Promote downloading the app, selecting a primary care provider, and completing the member profile. 
  • Strong Aggregator Partnerships: Collaborative communication plans between aggregators and insurers can improve retention among converted consumers, avoiding confusion and reinforcing the plan selection. 
  • Holistic Analyses: Regular analyses of aggregator-captured members are necessary to assess goal achievement and optimize aggregator utilization for future strategies. 

Navigating the Future of Healthcare Marketing

In conclusion, aggregators are an integral part of the health insurance landscape, offering companies the choice to actively capitalize on their strengths or passively receive sales. A scientific view of indirect channel tradeoffs, leveraging data to determine the future role of aggregators in a marketing and sales channel strategy, is key. To delve deeper into the intricacies of sales disruptions and recalibrated selling motions prompted by the pandemic, we invite you to download our whitepaper for invaluable insights. 

Download our whitepaper, “Navigating 5 Fundamental Shifts in Healthcare Marketing and Sales Channels”​

For a more in-depth exploration of the the role of aggregators, and four other disruptions, download our whitepaper.

Balancing self-service and agent-led channels in healthcare

Today, 39% of health insurance consumers purchase online, and this percentage is on the rise. However, it’s important to note that 61% of consumers still rely on face-to-face or telephonic agents for their insurance needs.1 Therefore, insurers must navigate the right balance between self-service-led experiences and agent-led experiences effectively.

3 Key Steps to Balancing Self-Service and Agent-Led Models

Fortunately, finding the right balance between self-service and agent-led can be undertaken systematically:

  1. Align Channels with How Customers Buy
  2. Adjust for Channel Economics
  3. Design Routes-to-Market Resources

Step One: Align Channels with How Customers Buy

Embrace the notion that channels don’t choose customers; customers choose channels. It’s a foundational principle for any go-to-market strategy. Regular buyer research is crucial for understanding why buyers prefer one channel over another.

A Self-Service Digital-Led Channel is defined as customers independently navigating digital platforms for transactions. When customers engage with agents—either virtually or in person—for assistance, guidance, or to finalize complex transactions, that is considered an Agent-Led Channel. As you can see in Figure 1 below, both Channels include owned (direct channels owned by an insurer) and rented channels (such as brokers, aggregators, etc.).

Keeping an ongoing 360-degree view of how customers buy is critical to deeply understanding why buyers within each line of insurance are choosing one channel over another. These varying customer intentions and motivations by channel will provide insight into current and potential future buyer segments, and ultimately, the path to designing a more relevant CX.

Figure 1: Health insurance channel landscape

Step Two: Adjust for Channel Economics

Channel economics are the efficiencies (or lack thereof) to acquire new customers. Focus on three key performance indicators (KPIs) to adjust appropriately:

  1. Selling expense-to-revenue ratio (E/R) – Measuring E/R by channel ensures that cost-of-sale economics are affordable in the context of overall business profitability targets.
  2. Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) – Understanding the cost to acquire a member provides insight into the upfront channel cost, which is essential to forecasting and projections.
  3. Member Lifetime Value (LTV) – While some channels may be more expensive in the short-term, they may yield high lifetime value customers for greater long-term results.

Step Three: Design Routes-to-Market Resources

Conduct thorough resource planning for each channel, covering infrastructure, training, and marketing. Ensure clear documentation of resources allocated to each channel, including expenses, and review this at least quarterly to align with channel performance and buyer feedback.

  1. Update Infrastructure: For Self-Service Digital-Led channels, prioritize a best-in-class online experience. For Agent-Led channels, secure or renew partnerships with brokers and aggregators.
  2. Ongoing Training: Train technologists to troubleshoot issues via Self-Service Digital-Led channels and train agents how to use sales platforms and understand the nuances of plan benefits in local areas.
  3. Marketing Support: Deploy demand capture campaigns for Self-Service Digital-Led channels to drive awareness and traffic. For Agent-led channels, deploy awareness marketing to drive consumer awareness and consideration, as well as provide agents with audience-specific materials to aid in the sales experience.

Planning for Tomorrow’s NextGen Distribution Model

Health insurers are facing a dynamic landscape where the balance between self-service and agent-led channels is pivotal. Adapting to evolving customer expectations and optimizing business outcomes requires a strategic approach. The three steps detailed in this blog should be addressed in the context of long-term strategy. Utilizing a “clean sheet” technique, it’s important to envision a distribution model five years ahead to foster innovative test-and-learn opportunities.

Adapting to digital and omnichannel experiences is essential for success. Doing so while adjusting for channel economics, and investing in effective routes-to-markets, insurers can not only thrive in the present but actively prepare for the uncertainties of tomorrow.

Download our whitepaper, “Navigating 5 Fundamental Shifts in Healthcare Marketing and Sales Channels”​

For a more in-depth exploration of the changing balance between self-service and agent-led channels, and four other disruptions, download our whitepaper.

1 Derek Andersen. “41 Insurance Marketing Statistics You Need to Know in 2024,” Invoca, October 3, 2023; https://www.invoca.com/blog/ insurance-marketing-statistics

Channel disruption: Navigating 5 fundamental shifts in healthcare marketing and sales channels

Channel disruption: Navigating 5 fundamental shifts in healthcare marketing and sales channels

A comprehensive resource on navigating channel disruptions in healthcare

Over the past four years, the Covid-19 pandemic, tightened marketing budgets, and consumer migration to digital channels have forced major changes to healthcare companies’ sales and marketing efforts. Marketing and sales leaders must now adapt to this new landscape by allocating shrinking budgets effectively, transitioning away from agent-led sales, and harnessing the power of automation to deliver personalized experiences at scale.

Drawing on deep industry expertise, this paper examines five disruptions impacting go-to-market strategy along with specific best practice solutions for navigating:

  • How to optimize a sales coverage model amidst shifting market dynamics
  • The art and science of calibrating the role of aggregators in a successful go-to-market strategy
  • The brand awareness imperative and its role in an insurer’s long-term success
  • How to strategically plan for local success and avoid the local marketing measurement trap
  • How to overcome the challenges of scaling personalized journeys

Thank you for Downloading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus vel tincidunt turpis. Fusce tristique cursus malesuada. Pellentesque euismod nisi eget nunc sagittis ullamcorper. Duis vitae aliquet diam. Proin a blandit nisl. 

Subscribe to Marketbridge Updates

This 27-page paper covers several topics in-depth…

Sales Disruption

  • Changing balance between self-service and agent-led channels
  • The role of aggregators

Marketing Disruption

  • The importance of brand marketing
  • Leveraging local marketing strategies effectively
  • The potential of (and barriers to) marketing automation platforms

The retention imperative: Securing long-term revenue growth in healthcare

As the health insurance landscape grows increasingly competitive, insurers must adapt to market changes to sustain revenue growth. For many individual products such as Medicare Advantage, individual health, and ancillary plans, switching rates are on the rise, reducing new plan members’ long-term value (LTV). It has become clear that relying solely on acquisition strategies is no longer viable; carriers must now focus on improving member retention rates.

Member Retention in Health Insurance

Acquisition vs. Retention Strategies

To illustrate that acquisition strategies alone are no longer viable, a simple pro forma scenario is useful. To set a baseline, let’s assume an insurance carrier has an individual product line of $400M in revenue, and let’s say that, based on recent years’ performance, membership is projected to decline by 4% over the next four years. This baseline projection now has two alternatives to achieve near-revenue neutrality: 1) spend more on acquisition to cover the retention shortfall (meaning 7% YoY acquisition growth), or 2) spend more on retention to end the rate decline (meaning improving average retention by 7 months). These three top-line scenarios are depicted in the graph below:

Assuming a member acquisition cost of $1000, the company would need to spend $375M more on acquisition to shore up the gap. With decreasing productivity in acquisition marketing given the competitive environment, this is likely a best-case scenario. Now, let’s think about if those dollars were used to drive more quality member interactions and relationship equity. Focusing on the right areas of improvement are very likely to achieve the small amount of retention improvement required. Most health insurance carriers, given market circumstances right now, are likely better off considering strategic alternatives for improving retention than simply throwing more money at acquisition.

Embracing Member Success and Engagement Models

An intriguing parallel can be drawn between this challenge and the shift to subscription and XaaS (Everything as a Service) business models that occurred in many B2B industries, particularly within the tech sector. As these industries transitioned to subscription-based models over the past decade, the importance of customer retention and long-term revenue growth became more apparent.

To respond to this shift, the tech industry developed a new sales role: “Customer Success.” In smaller markets, marketing teams have taken on the responsibility of driving customer experience to ensure revenue growth. These new roles and responsibilities within commercial teams go beyond traditional servicing, placing a strong emphasis on customer engagement and relationship development.

To thrive in this increasingly competitive market, health insurance carriers should learn from their tech counterparts and fully embrace a member success model that goes beyond traditional customer service. The first step is to identify the key moments of truth where the member experience plays a crucial role in retention. At Marketbridge, these are referred to as Zero Moments of Truth (ZMOTs). For example, the first 90 days on a plan can be a critical period for establishing engagement and building product equity with new members.

To further enhance member retention, health insurers can consider the following strategies:

  • Personalized Communications: Tailor communications to individual member needs and preferences, offering valuable resources and support in managing their health and well-being.
  • Proactive Health Management: Reward members who take advantage of health assessments and ongoing preventive care, demonstrating the carrier’s commitment to their health.
  • Streamlined Claims Processing: Simplify the claims process with easy-to-use online tools and responsive member service to alleviate the stress associated with healthcare expenses.
  • Reward Loyalty: Implement loyalty programs that offer incentives for long-term members, such as additional benefits, or access to exclusive resources.
  • Enhance Digital Channels: Invest in user-friendly mobile apps and websites that provide easy access to plan information, claims status, and health resources, ensuring a seamless member experience.

While many health insurance carriers have Member Services teams and are beginning to invest heavily in tactics like the above, we still do not typically see cohesion and ownership across channels. Some carriers are looking for agents to take on more Member Services activities, however, a truly robust Member Services function can partner with agents to ease the member experience. Yet we typically see that the agent and sales apparatus significantly outpace the team staffing for Member Services. To truly move the needle, a new responsibility/function is likely necessary to be the owner of all member engagement and retention metrics. Whether this falls to a human-based servicing/member success function, a more marketing-focused revenue motion, or a hybrid, the critical point is someone and some team need to be on the hook for the holistic strategy and be empowered to execute against it.

Thriving in the Competitive Healthcare Market

To summarize, the competitive issues many health insurers are facing can be managed by learning from the strategies implemented by B2B sectors, particularly the tech industry, as they pivoted to subscription-based business models. By adopting member success and engagement models that focus on improving the member experience at key moments of truth, insurance carriers can positively impact retention rates and sustain revenue growth in an increasingly competitive market. By embracing innovation and putting members first, health insurers can ensure a prosperous future in this ever-evolving industry.

Medicare insurance marketing: Navigating national vs. local challenges

When it comes to Medicare insurance marketing, leading payers must navigate the implementation of National versus Local media. Over the last few years, the top incumbent Medicare Advantage payers have spent 70%-80% of their media budgets on national media buys versus 20%-30% on locally based media.1 So, what’s the big deal? Make no mistake, the path to developing, implementing, and measuring a National versus Local marketing strategy is fraught with unique challenges.

From our experience working with top Medicare Advantage payers, we’ve identified three core issues causing friction. By addressing these issues, payers can improve strategic planning, implement more omnichannel marketing, and ultimately, drive membership growth:

  1. Poor cross-functional team collaboration
  2. Changing industry and market dynamics
  3. Complex media budget allocation and optimization

1. Poor Cross-functional Team Collaboration

Poor cross-functional team collaboration is often rooted in conflict between different business objectives. While working with Medicare Advantage payers, we find that the National teams tend to be more marketing-centric and Local teams tend to be more product and sales-centric. That means, despite the value that can be tapped from collaborating, these teams tend to be more siloed than not. And when that’s the case, bringing teams together for planning and alignment can be a point of friction.

For example, when it comes to specific objectives, the National team is focused on cost-effective marketing. Since they have access to national media buys, they benefit from economies of scale; meaning they gain significant media cost advantages by reaching consumers across the national footprint. However, a key consideration in marketing across a national footprint is that messaging cannot include specific plan benefits that may vary from ZIP code to ZIP code due to CMS guidelines. This isn’t a disadvantage, as often National objectives like brand building or motivating a consumer to call to shop for a plan, can be successful without benefit-specific details.

However, when you’re a member of the Local product team that worked for months to invest in competitive benefits, it can feel frustrating not to see those benefits front and center in marketing messaging – especially if they present a competitive advantage. Local marketing can help showcase those benefits and bring awareness to market-specific circumstances, such as entrance into a new market.

Alignment to Goals and Omnichannel Messaging

Successful cross-functional collaboration is dependent on gaining alignment. The alignment of common goals and key objectives is a necessary starting point before media plans are designed. This cannot be accomplished without regular ongoing collaboration. Each enrollment or planning season, it’s imperative to reassess the short-term and long-term goals and objectives as they often shift in scope or priority. This process requires cross-functional updates that share consumer, product, marketing, and sales channel insights.

As you’ll see in the chart below both the National and the Local teams tend to be steeped in deep data and insights. And when this information is shared, it can unlock integrated media and channel strategies that can holistically advance a payer’s go-to-market strategy including landing on the right mix of National versus Local Marketing.

Figure 1: The National and the Local teams tend to be steeped in deep data and insights.

2. Changing Industry and Market Dynamics

Another issue that complicates optimizing the right mix of National versus Local marketing is changing industry and market dynamics. While the Medicare Advantage (MA) industry is experiencing growth, the “where” and “how” of MA growth are becoming increasingly nuanced (Chartis).

Medicare Advantage has seen record 2023 enrollment, with program participation adding 2.7 million beneficiaries, or YOY growth of 9.5%. Today, 48% of Medicare eligibles are enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan (Chartis). And with 10,000 seniors “aging in” to Medicare every day, MA total enrollment is expected to grow from 64 million to 80 million by 2030 (Managed Care).

However, “how” to capture this growth has become more complex due to shifting consumer behavior, evolving CMS regulations, and a crowded competitive environment. Here are just some of the staggering facts:

Shifting Consumer Behavior:

  • MA Switching: Consumers are switching MA plans at an increased rate. Deft Research reported that MA switching saw an increase during AEP2023 (the first time since 2019) to 15%.
  • OM Contraction: Original Medicare is losing enrollees at a rapid pace. From 2022 to 2023 OM enrollment contracted by 1.3 million.
  • Sales Channels: More than half of switchers enrolled through an Agent, and about a quarter of those via in-person meetings (Deft Research).

Crowded Competitive Environment:

  • Marketing Spend: 10% to 30% of the annual $2B AEP marketing spend comes from third-party aggregators/partner call centers, with the balance of the spend from payers.2
  • Competitor Growth: While incumbents United and Humana accounted for 44% and 23% of enrollment, newer entrants delivered nearly 22% growth (100K lives) Devoted Health accounting for nearly two-thirds of this growth.
  • Quality scores: 73% of MA beneficiaries are enrolled in health plans with 4+ stars.

Evolving CMS Regulations:

  • Marketing/Advertising: From specific advertising language to tighter messaging based on plan availability, to new TV ad approval processes and timelines, etc.
  • Third-Party Marketing Organizations: Stronger TPMO oversight, including beneficiary data collection and restricted distribution.
  • Permission to Contact: Extended expiration dates

Nuanced Market-Level Dynamics:

  • Disruptions: Competitive entrants, exits
  • Target Audiences: Dual-eligibles, multi-cultural, etc.
  • Plan Competitiveness: 5-star plans, MACVAT scores

If you didn’t think cross-functional team collaboration was important before, reviewing this list should emphasize the critical nature of coordinated planning amidst these complex and ever-changing dynamics.

Analyze the Four C’s

The reality of these conditions means regularly adapting your go-to-market plans and the role of National and Local marketing within them. Begin by reviewing the four C’s: Consumers, Competitors, CMS, and the Community. It’s a critical process for auditing the current and future state dynamics that payers need to factor into strategic planning, or else fall behind.

3. Complex Media Budget Allocation and Optimization

Allocating and optimizing marketing budgets across media and geographies is a common challenge. Most payers are using Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) and Multi-Touch Attribution (MTA) analytic approaches to answer questions such as, “How did marketing impact the number of enrollments?” and “What is the true return on brand investments?”

Brand/Awareness Marketing

When it comes to upper funnel Brand/Awareness marketing, National and Local marketing face a similar measurement challenge. The objective of this upper funnel marketing is the attitudinal measures of awareness and consideration. This requires consumer survey data versus a KPI metric such as enrollments.

Where things differ is Local Marketing suffers from a lack of scale. More times than not, Local Awareness campaigns run for too short of a period to measure changes in behavior, or the marketing investment levels are too small to drive significant impact because thinner Local budgets were spread across too many Local markets at a time.

Lead Generation Marketing

When it comes to lower-funnel lead generation marketing, National and Local campaigns typically have the objective of driving a consumer response; a phone call, or filling out a web form. Measuring these types of campaigns can be straightforward, using last-touch attribution, though MMM and MTA models would provide a more accurate, holistic view of channel impact.

Measurement of any kind (last touch, MMM, and MTA) requires clean and consistent data. That means all marketing data should be exhaustive (including all channels), keyed (a reliable way to identify individual-to-channel interaction), and labeled (clear metadata to enable analysis).

This is where measuring Local marketing performance can encounter friction. First and foremost, if the teams setting up Local marketing campaigns are different than the teams setting up National campaigns, the processes for tagging, tracking, and capturing campaign data are often not universal. Unfortunately, this is typically the root cause of lost Local marketing data and insights.

Another issue that Local marketing must navigate is the end sales channel. Many times, Local lead generation campaigns route to local agents in the field, which adds a level of tracking complexity that can lead to lost attribution.

Inputs for Measurement Success

Best-in-class MMM and MTA models help payers understand the recommended marketing mix (across the funnel media) and geographies. But, simply having these models in place is not enough. It’s very important to audit these models to be sure both National and Local marketing data are regularly and accurately included as inputs. Media vendors change and feeds break, so don’t forgo this step. Ensuring accurate marketing data feeds will allow for a read on National and Local media tactics and the role they play in the consumer purchase journey.

Finally, because Local marketing budgets are smaller, it’s imperative to have them work harder for you by honing in on location, location, location. There is no simple one-size-fits-all solution. This requires aligning business goals with market goals and assessing the market dynamics and marketing gaps to make the best choice. Sometimes, you’ll have invested in specific Local markets near-term for a quick win that season, other times you’ll invest in key markets to continue building a long-term path to enrollment growth.

Summary

Ultimately, it’s important to remember that both National and Local media reach consumers locally, and both have pros and cons depending on what you need to accomplish. Despite the challenges from the three common issues discussed, 1. Poor cross-functional team collaboration, 2. Changing industry and market dynamics, and 3. Complex media budget allocation and optimization—payers that do the work to address these issues can reduce friction points, improve strategic planning and ultimately, drive membership growth with a custom mix of National and Local marketing.

Download our whitepaper, “Navigating 5 Fundamental Shifts in Healthcare Marketing and Sales Channels”​

For a more in-depth exploration of how to leverage local marketing strategies effectively, along with and four other disruptions impacting go-to-market strategy, download our whitepaper.

1, 2 Kantar Media Data, AEP 2022 & AEP 2023

Skip to content